Rule 18.

Discussion in 'Garry's Mod: Flood' started by Rick, Jun 8, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rick

    Rick female nipple Gold VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    613
    18. No invisible boats. (Transparent boats must not be less than 50% transparent)

    Hey there all, I just realized that most moderators may have a bit of a problem enforcing this rule in the future. Here's the problem.
    I don't know what 50% transparency looks like on all of the props.
    I don't think there's any way of checking.
    I could be lied to by players because I have no way of checking.

    My question is, should the moderators and/or players use their own judgment as to whether or not it is breaking a rule? Or is there a way of checking for sure, and if not, could we perhaps have a method for doing this?
     
    #1
  2. cafe

    cafe Member Platinum VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2014
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    7
    Maybe a vote to judge if a prop or boat is too transparent?
     
    #2
  3. Rick

    Rick female nipple Gold VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    613
    At one point I did think that we could implement some sort of voting system wheras donators could promote a yes/no question to the server in order to settle petty arguments.
     
    #3
  4. jeffreythe00

    jeffreythe00 Dreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    526
    Rule 18 is one of those things that's pretty much common sense.

    * If the material/color used is so transparent that you have a very difficult time seeing it. Then it's not allowed. If you can see the boat "somewhat" then I'd say thats fine.
     
    #4
  5. Bayrock

    Bayrock Founder & Developer Staff Member Founder

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    661
    Discord:
    Bayrock#2940
    Jeffrey has explained this as well as I would have. The meaning of rule 18 is essentially implied and should be simple enough to decipher without over-complicating the process.

    With that being said I believe this thread has been concluded and will be closed at this point.
     
    #5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.